‘Complete double standard’: Tobacco giant opposed rules in Africa which are mandatory in UK

The tobacco company stands accused of “total contradiction” for campaigning against tobacco control measures in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Correspondence acquired by reporters dispatched by the corporation's branch in Zambia to the nation's political leaders demands measures restricting tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be canceled or deferred.

The corporation is pursuing changes to a draft bill that include reductions in the recommended coverage of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on scented cigarette varieties, and watered-down penalties for any firms breaking the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“If I was a politician, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” said Master Chimbala.

Over seven thousand citizens a year succumb to smoking-associated diseases, according to World Health Organization estimates.

The campaigner stated the letter was believed to have been distributed to multiple official agencies and was in distribution within community advocacy networks.

International corporate influence worries

The situation emerges alongside broader worries about corporate intervention with health policies. Last month, WHO officials issued a warning that the smoking product companies was increasing attempts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“We see evidence of business advocacy everywhere. Tobacco company fingerprints are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN summit conference,” said Jorge Alday.

Likely impacts

“When public health regulation isn’t passed because of this letter, the price could be paid in individuals' health who might potentially stop smoking.”

The tobacco control bill going through Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and requiring that visual health alerts cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

In the letter, the corporation proposes this be reduced to thirty to fifty percent “according to global recommended threshold”, deferred for no less than 12 months after the legislation is approved.

Global health authorities in fact recommends a caution must occupy at least half of the front of a pack “and seek to occupy as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. Within Britain, warnings must cover 65% of a product container sides.

Flavored tobacco discussion

The company seeks the withdrawal of extensive controls on flavored cigarette varieties, suggesting that it would drive users to “black market” products. The corporation recommends prohibiting a smaller list of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The draft bill proposes sanctions for various offences “varying from a fraction of annual sales to ten-year jail sentences”.

Business explanation

Through correspondence, the managing director of the African subsidiary claims the company is dedicated to responsible corporate conduct” and “backs the goals of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the associated health impact” but maintains that “some regulations can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Activist reaction

The campaigner argued the company's suggested modifications would “weaken this legislation so much that the required influence for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that many such provisions existed in the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “complete contradiction”, he stated.

“We exist in a international community. Should I grow cigarettes in my back yard and harvest that and distribute the goods – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to benefit personally and all the subsequent offspring while my community's youth are dying … is in itself absolute spiritual bankruptcy.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the United Kingdom or other countries had failed to shutter businesses, Chimbala said. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. It only protects the people.”

Standard business position

A BAT Zambia spokesperson said: “BAT Zambia conducts its business in compliance with current country statutes. Additionally, the firm contributes in the country’s legislative process in line with the relevant frameworks which allow for stakeholder participation in legislation creation.”

The corporation remained “not opposed to regulation”, they said, noting that young individuals should be protected from access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We support developing rules to realize planned community wellbeing objectives, while recognizing the range of rights and obligations on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” the representative explained, adding that the corporation's recommendations “mirror the circumstances of the local commercial environment and smoking product business, which encompasses rising levels of illegal commerce”.

The country's office of trade, commerce and industry was solicited for statement.

Carla Castillo DDS
Carla Castillo DDS

An international development strategist with 15+ years of experience in sustainable policy design across Europe and Africa.